home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- LETTERS, Page 17FUSION OR ILLUSION?
-
- Whether Utah's Stanley Pons and Britain's Martin
- Fleischmann achieved cold fusion in a jar or merely a storm in
- a teacup (SCIENCE, May 8), they abdicated their higher calling
- as scientists in favor of "media science," a pseudoscientific
- forum. Unfortunately, their proponents and opponents have
- decided to choose the same regrettable course.
-
- Julian W. Proctor Wexford, Pa.
-
- One can understand why an announcement by two unknown
- scientists that they had achieved fusion would generate
- excitement. But why the expressions of outrage? Here are some
- reactions from modern scientists:
-
- How can chemists presume to know anything about atoms?
-
- How could anyone from Utah possibly discover anything?
-
- How dare these people compete for my funding?
-
- I was recently at an international scientific conference on
- fusion, and these views (phrased somewhat differently) were
- prominent.
-
- Theodore Rockwell Chevy Chase, Md.
-
- We know we can't get something from nothing, but human
- longing resurfaces. The search for unlimited power through
- fusion is a revival of the perennial dream of mastering the
- superhuman.
-
- Eugen Roder Leutkirch, West Germany
-
- How can such a simple experiment produce something not
- previously discovered? I am skeptical of the claims.
-
- Toby Griffin Erlanger, Ky.
-
- In response to your report, I'd say that there's inclusion
- of delusion with a profusion of confusion!
-
- Joseph M. Kosanovic Pittsburgh
-